![]() I think evil is the opposite of somethingness–evil is pure black nothingness. I don’t think evil is the opposite of good. If you have met someone who seems to stare at you excessively, or in a predatory way that makes you uneasy, that person is probably a psychopath or malignant narcissist trying to get their hooks into you. Make no mistake–they are predators out for the kill. During the “wooing” phase, you may think this intense stare indicates attentiveness and strong interest in you as a person, but actually all they’re interested in is how they can use you and later destroy you. Many people have mentioned the intense stare a psychopathic person will fix you with, even when they are trying to charm you into trusting them. It’s like standing at the precipice of a black hole, and what can be more terrifying than some nameless void that can suck you into itself–and can even swallow light? Like there’s nothing inside them except an vast and endless black void of nothingness. It’s a malignant look that makes you want to get away from them fast. It’s not so much a demonic look (which has a sort of life to it) as a dead, lifeless look that is far worse. I saw it once on my ex’s face when he was drunk and angry. I’ve described this look before–I’ve seen it on my mother’s face and it gave me nightmares for weeks. But sometimes they can be caught when their mask is momentarily down (usually when they’ve been called out–or caught), and it’s here when we see the emptiness and evil inside them. They can seem warm and charming when they want to. Follow Life's Little Mysteries on Twitter llmysteries, then join us on Facebook.Psychopaths and malignant narcissists are very good at putting on masks to get others to trust them. It is possible, Burton said, that we may "feel" as if we are physically located near our eyes because our identity emerges in the neurons there.įollow Natalie Wolchover on Twitter nattyover. It is also worth noting that the part of the brain in which self-awareness is thought to arise, called the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, happens to be located behind the eyes. "That seems to be predisposed by the way our brain works, though the mechanisms remain unclear." "We always have the tendency to locate something and materialize it in the body as mind or as soul," he wrote in an email. Georg Northoff, a neuropsychiatrist at the University of Ottawa, agrees that the authors' interpretation of their experimental results is "far-fetched." The issues with this particular study aside, Northoff said a large body of evidence suggests most people do have a sense of self that physically manifests itself in their bodies. Objects look bigger when they are nearer one's eyes, and this may have confused the participants into labeling them as "closer." Or, perhaps it's because adults have learned that it's good etiquette to make eye-contact.įurthermore, the study participants may not have interpreted the idea of the buzzing fly and snowflake being "closer" to a cartoon characters as meaning that they were closer to its soul or self. Perhaps, for example, eyes take on more importance as we develop awareness of the social cues that other people convey with their eyes. ![]() In other words, it seems we learn to associate identity with eyes, rather than doing it innately from birth. "This suggests that something has transpired during the time between age 4 and adulthood that affects our understanding of the identity of other people," Burton said. Meanwhile, the adults almost unanimously selected the chest-eyes. Almost as many children thought the buzzing fly was closest to the alien when it was near his eyeless head than when it was near his eye-bearing chest. Neurologist Robert Burton, author of numerous books and articles on the mind-body connection, thinks the results don't rule out the possibility that Westerners' sense that we exist in our eyes is culturally indoctrinated.īurton, former chief of the division of neurology at University of California, San Francisco-Mount Zion Hospital, said the most interesting result of the study seems to have been brushed under the rug by the researchers: It is that the 4-year-olds and adults didn't actually give the same responses during the experiment with the alien cartoon character. However, experts disagreed about the implications of the research. "The indirect nature of our method, and the fact that these judgments are shared by adults and preschoolers, suggests that our results do not reflect a culturally learned understanding … but might instead be rooted in a more intuitive or phenomenological sense of where in our bodies we reside," the authors concluded. As it turned out, it was - even among young children.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |